<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viva Brand Dinosaurs!?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2004/07/viva_brand_dino.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2004/07/viva_brand_dino.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2004/07/viva_brand_dino.html/comment-page-1#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just thinking that perhaps Interbrand and Business week are not the most subjective companies to be completing brand ratings,  after all when IBM and AMEX want to launch a new product who do they go to?  How many brands in the top 100 are on interbrands client list,  I wonder?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.interbrand.com/portfolio.asp&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bet 1/2 the top 50 are major Business Week advertisers too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thinking that perhaps Interbrand and Business week are not the most subjective companies to be completing brand ratings,  after all when IBM and AMEX want to launch a new product who do they go to?  How many brands in the top 100 are on interbrands client list,  I wonder?  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.interbrand.com/portfolio.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.interbrand.com/portfolio.asp</a></p>
<p>Bet 1/2 the top 50 are major Business Week advertisers too.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2004/07/viva_brand_dino.html/comment-page-1#comment-5505</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5505</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry,  had to comment again,  this article really has me thinking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What do Intel do anyway?  They make a chip inside a PC,  do I know what that chip does - do you?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GE is a massive company which owns many products in many different sectors.  Would I say this is a super brand,  not at all, don&#039;t see it on my super market shelf,  they don&#039;t send me mailshots if they affect my life (And I&#039;m sure they do) they do it under a different brand.  So a brand which does not communicate anything,  should this even be in the top 1000,  just becuase they have done a good job of getting their initials GE out there does not mean that its a good brand,  just a big advertising budget.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IBM,  Where are they now.  The brand means nothing now,  they lost most of the office battles first to Novel then Microsoft,  what relevence do they have to todays IT managers?  I don&#039;t know but I suspect that they are just hanging on in there with their support of old systems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Marlboro = Death&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That leaves AMEX - Nice job on the Black card party which Alexander McQueen styled the other day but I ask you,  how is the brand relevent when so many of its competitors have caught it up?  Most shops in London don&#039;t accept it because they charge too high a percentage on transactions and the buzz (which they probably created (which would be a really really good piece of marketing if they did)) is that even the celebs just want green cards rather than the costly gold and black ones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In all if you&#039;re going to judge who has the best brands there has to be substance and relevance behind the judgement.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not just that people can say, &#039;oh....I&#039;ve heard of them or yeah....a few years ago I had one of them.&#039;  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nuff said.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry,  had to comment again,  this article really has me thinking.</p>
<p>What do Intel do anyway?  They make a chip inside a PC,  do I know what that chip does &#8211; do you?</p>
<p>GE is a massive company which owns many products in many different sectors.  Would I say this is a super brand,  not at all, don&#8217;t see it on my super market shelf,  they don&#8217;t send me mailshots if they affect my life (And I&#8217;m sure they do) they do it under a different brand.  So a brand which does not communicate anything,  should this even be in the top 1000,  just becuase they have done a good job of getting their initials GE out there does not mean that its a good brand,  just a big advertising budget.</p>
<p>IBM,  Where are they now.  The brand means nothing now,  they lost most of the office battles first to Novel then Microsoft,  what relevence do they have to todays IT managers?  I don&#8217;t know but I suspect that they are just hanging on in there with their support of old systems.</p>
<p>Marlboro = Death</p>
<p>That leaves AMEX &#8211; Nice job on the Black card party which Alexander McQueen styled the other day but I ask you,  how is the brand relevent when so many of its competitors have caught it up?  Most shops in London don&#8217;t accept it because they charge too high a percentage on transactions and the buzz (which they probably created (which would be a really really good piece of marketing if they did)) is that even the celebs just want green cards rather than the costly gold and black ones.</p>
<p>In all if you&#8217;re going to judge who has the best brands there has to be substance and relevance behind the judgement.  </p>
<p>Not just that people can say, &#8216;oh&#8230;.I&#8217;ve heard of them or yeah&#8230;.a few years ago I had one of them.&#8217;  </p>
<p>Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2004/07/viva_brand_dino.html/comment-page-1#comment-5506</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5506</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article on Forcing Brands into Early Retirement on Branc Channel:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.brandchannel.com/start1.asp?fa_id=222&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article on Forcing Brands into Early Retirement on Branc Channel:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brandchannel.com/start1.asp?fa_id=222" rel="nofollow">http://www.brandchannel.com/start1.asp?fa_id=222</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2004/07/viva_brand_dino.html/comment-page-1#comment-5507</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5507</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe tattoos are really the only way to show a connection between brands and lifetime loyalty...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Revenge Of The Tattooed Nerds Article (and Pics)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.bmezine.com/news/pubring/20040720.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe tattoos are really the only way to show a connection between brands and lifetime loyalty&#8230;</p>
<p>Revenge Of The Tattooed Nerds Article (and Pics)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmezine.com/news/pubring/20040720.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bmezine.com/news/pubring/20040720.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon King</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2004/07/viva_brand_dino.html/comment-page-1#comment-5508</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5508</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Advertising Space Needed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PSFK is offering £20.00 and a £5.00 a year for life advertising fee for the first person to agree to have PSFK&#039;s logo tattooed on their body.  The tattoo has to be in a place where it is on permanent display.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If this is going to start a trend you can be sure we&#039;ll try to get in on the ground floor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertising Space Needed.</p>
<p>PSFK is offering £20.00 and a £5.00 a year for life advertising fee for the first person to agree to have PSFK&#8217;s logo tattooed on their body.  The tattoo has to be in a place where it is on permanent display.</p>
<p>If this is going to start a trend you can be sure we&#8217;ll try to get in on the ground floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
