Saatchi Doesn’t Get It

4 Responses to “Saatchi Doesn’t Get It”

1. Bob G
   Posted from: 66.161.222.197

   January 10th, 2005 at 10:04 am

   Meanwhile in tomorrow’s Ad Age, Crispin is named Agency of the Year for being media agnostic and for non-TV, non-traditional ideas.

   And Saatchi is given 1 of 5 stars in the same magazine for its performance in 2004.
2. hidden persuader
   Posted from: 81.84.134.175

   January 10th, 2005 at 5:01 pm

   ahahah no comments … maybe it’s the “love marks” jargon-fever thing that is blinding some people at S&S.
3. caff
   Posted from: 209.6.124.23

   January 23rd, 2005 at 8:31 pm

   I don’t totally disagree with that comment though. If you think of all the viral/non-traditional stuff, really only a small percentage of it is actually good. Then again, I suppose you can say the same thing about the traditional stuff as well, so I’m just going to waiver here in the middle. ;-)
4. wa
   Posted from: 24.82.128.123

   December 5th, 2007 at 5:45 pm

   That reads like:

   “I just want to make TV ads, like we did in the old days. Boo Hoo.”

   But perhaps I’m as biased as Mary.

Leave a Comment