<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Betas : The Emperor&#8217;s New Clothes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rajagopal sukumar</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator>rajagopal sukumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3618</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good one Piers. Amidst the &quot;everything that Google does is great&quot; hysteria, your post asks some very important questions. Hope Brin &amp; Page are listening. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one Piers. Amidst the &#8220;everything that Google does is great&#8221; hysteria, your post asks some very important questions. Hope Brin &#038; Page are listening. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sukumar. Anyone, care to differ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sukumar. Anyone, care to differ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3620</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3620</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not a marketing expert, but I don&#039;t agree with the statement: &quot;However, it doesn&#039;t appear to try to establish a defendable emotional connection between the brand and the consumer&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a consumer, and a devoted user of all things Google, I find the fact that they let the general public in on their betas a liberating and empowering aproach to developing products and services.  I love how Gmail has changed over the years with each new feature only making it better.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google as a brand means &#039;innovation and simplicity&#039;.  They&#039;re on the cutting edge and providing early access to these technologies/services puts them ahead of their peers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just my $.02.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a marketing expert, but I don&#8217;t agree with the statement: &#8220;However, it doesn&#8217;t appear to try to establish a defendable emotional connection between the brand and the consumer&#8221;.</p>
<p>As a consumer, and a devoted user of all things Google, I find the fact that they let the general public in on their betas a liberating and empowering aproach to developing products and services.  I love how Gmail has changed over the years with each new feature only making it better.</p>
<p>Google as a brand means &#8216;innovation and simplicity&#8217;.  They&#8217;re on the cutting edge and providing early access to these technologies/services puts them ahead of their peers.</p>
<p>Just my $.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3621</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3621</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A very intersting point of view Patrick. I would argue that altho Google does have a clear position today, &#039;innovation and simplicity&#039; is not a defendable platform in the long run. It&#039;s still product focused. It&#039;s still &#039;kills 100% germs&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very intersting point of view Patrick. I would argue that altho Google does have a clear position today, &#8216;innovation and simplicity&#8217; is not a defendable platform in the long run. It&#8217;s still product focused. It&#8217;s still &#8216;kills 100% germs&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Product extensions need to strengthen not broaden the meaining of a brand. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As long as what google has to offer continues to support their trueline &quot;making the world&#039;s information easier to access&quot; (or whatever it actually is) fine. But as soon as they start moving outside of that, the meaining of the brand will begin to change in the public&#039;s mind. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Eric at Method was asked about whether he had considered extending his brand because it was so successful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I cringe when I hear about people starting to extend their brand—most often it results in bad decisions. As long as Method continues to pay off on &quot;people against dirty&quot;, or Google on their promise it should be fine—but start wandering too far off and you may see the beginning of the end.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Product extensions need to strengthen not broaden the meaining of a brand. </p>
<p>As long as what google has to offer continues to support their trueline &#8220;making the world&#8217;s information easier to access&#8221; (or whatever it actually is) fine. But as soon as they start moving outside of that, the meaining of the brand will begin to change in the public&#8217;s mind. </p>
<p>Eric at Method was asked about whether he had considered extending his brand because it was so successful.</p>
<p>I cringe when I hear about people starting to extend their brand—most often it results in bad decisions. As long as Method continues to pay off on &#8220;people against dirty&#8221;, or Google on their promise it should be fine—but start wandering too far off and you may see the beginning of the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3623</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3623</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well look at that—they&#039;ve already started to wander. What do candles have to do with &quot;people against dirty&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.methodhome.com/products/candles.php&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well look at that—they&#8217;ve already started to wander. What do candles have to do with &#8220;people against dirty&#8221;?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.methodhome.com/products/candles.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.methodhome.com/products/candles.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DataGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator>DataGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3624</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d like to see a source for the claim that Method sells 25% of hand soap at Target.  I&#039;ve seen the real ACNielsen data and Method&#039;s share in barely existent.  The brand is LOSING distribution in many stores.  Why?  Because the product is a poor performer, the cost is 2x other well known brands, and most people have never heard of it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t just buy into the hype - get your facts straight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see a source for the claim that Method sells 25% of hand soap at Target.  I&#8217;ve seen the real ACNielsen data and Method&#8217;s share in barely existent.  The brand is LOSING distribution in many stores.  Why?  Because the product is a poor performer, the cost is 2x other well known brands, and most people have never heard of it.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t just buy into the hype &#8211; get your facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2005/09/googles_betas_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3625</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it&#039;s the figure banded around at the Influx conference last Tuesday. Maybe it&#039;s 25% of total revenue if it&#039;s 2x.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I disagree most people have never heard of it. I&#039;ve never known so many people who would never step into a Target before, own the product. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s the figure banded around at the Influx conference last Tuesday. Maybe it&#8217;s 25% of total revenue if it&#8217;s 2x.</p>
<p>I disagree most people have never heard of it. I&#8217;ve never known so many people who would never step into a Target before, own the product. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
