<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of the Blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2006/02/state_of_the_bl.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/02/state_of_the_bl.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JT Barnhart</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/02/state_of_the_bl.html/comment-page-1#comment-2826</link>
		<dc:creator>JT Barnhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2826</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One thing that seems to be relatively ignored by trackig agencies like Technorati is a qualitative evaluation. With everything from spam bloggers to Myspace flooding the blogosphere we have to really consider just what those numbers mean. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What are these millions of blogs about, who is writing them and what are they trying to acccomplish? When online publishing became so simple people could say &quot;why not&quot; instead of &quot;why&quot; they started to publish anything and everything their whims dictate. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At this point the blogosphere is a lot like a giant a crowded bar. The bulk of the talking is about small personal stuff that only matters to the people directly involved. A whole lot of it is just plain trite garbage and there are a few people off in the corners having some really cool conversations about art, politics, green design, marketing or whatever...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ultimately, my point is that numbers about the blogosphere as a whole are becoming less and less meaningful. This trend can only continue until we find a way to add real and maybe actionable meaning to those mind blowing numbers. A simple piece of evidence to consider is that even with Technorati tracking 27.2 million blogs, I still have to explain what blog is several times a week.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that seems to be relatively ignored by trackig agencies like Technorati is a qualitative evaluation. With everything from spam bloggers to Myspace flooding the blogosphere we have to really consider just what those numbers mean. </p>
<p>What are these millions of blogs about, who is writing them and what are they trying to acccomplish? When online publishing became so simple people could say &#8220;why not&#8221; instead of &#8220;why&#8221; they started to publish anything and everything their whims dictate. </p>
<p>At this point the blogosphere is a lot like a giant a crowded bar. The bulk of the talking is about small personal stuff that only matters to the people directly involved. A whole lot of it is just plain trite garbage and there are a few people off in the corners having some really cool conversations about art, politics, green design, marketing or whatever&#8230;</p>
<p>Ultimately, my point is that numbers about the blogosphere as a whole are becoming less and less meaningful. This trend can only continue until we find a way to add real and maybe actionable meaning to those mind blowing numbers. A simple piece of evidence to consider is that even with Technorati tracking 27.2 million blogs, I still have to explain what blog is several times a week.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
