<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Google Even Get Search Right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:55:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spanky</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/comment-page-1#comment-9751</link>
		<dc:creator>Spanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9751</guid>
		<description>Hard to choose between this rant&#039;s half-baked take on search technology and its narcissistic tone (note how many examples involve this site&#039;s failure to get its SEO sorted out). Of course, PSFK includes Microsoft among its consulting clients (see http://www.psfk.com/about-psfk ). What a surprise to see Google getting trashed here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to choose between this rant&#8217;s half-baked take on search technology and its narcissistic tone (note how many examples involve this site&#8217;s failure to get its SEO sorted out). Of course, PSFK includes Microsoft among its consulting clients (see <a href="http://www.psfk.com/about-psfk" rel="nofollow">http://www.psfk.com/about-psfk</a> ). What a surprise to see Google getting trashed here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: queenofvondonia</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/comment-page-1#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>queenofvondonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to add that I have also been frustrated by the lack of good search results on Google lately. I do beg to differ though on the password protected searches. They do come up for me sometimes. I suppose its good for someone selling memberships to their sites (which I happen to do) but it phishes me off as I am already aggravated about the lack of good search results =)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add that I have also been frustrated by the lack of good search results on Google lately. I do beg to differ though on the password protected searches. They do come up for me sometimes. I suppose its good for someone selling memberships to their sites (which I happen to do) but it phishes me off as I am already aggravated about the lack of good search results =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozgur alaz</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/comment-page-1#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>ozgur alaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You are absolutely right. Lately, i have complaintion that google  results has many parked  (advertising) sites.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I started to use delicious for %80 of my search. It brings great and targeted results. n the other hand, i only use google for my descriptive searches&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right. Lately, i have complaintion that google  results has many parked  (advertising) sites.</p>
<p>I started to use delicious for %80 of my search. It brings great and targeted results. n the other hand, i only use google for my descriptive searches</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whiskers</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/comment-page-1#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>Whiskers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So - how come we still use Google - haven&#039;t seen any sign of their traffic (or stock price) reclining....&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8211; how come we still use Google &#8211; haven&#8217;t seen any sign of their traffic (or stock price) reclining&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/comment-page-1#comment-1866</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1866</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PSFK: Can Google Even Get Search Right?&lt;/strong&gt;

aybe it&#039;s a mix of over engineering and distraction that has hit Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PSFK: Can Google Even Get Search Right?</strong></p>
<p>aybe it&#8217;s a mix of over engineering and distraction that has hit Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/comment-page-1#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can Google Even Get Search Right?&lt;/strong&gt;

Maybe it&#039;s a mix of over engineering and distraction that has hit Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can Google Even Get Search Right?</strong></p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a mix of over engineering and distraction that has hit Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSFK</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/comment-page-1#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>PSFK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can Google 1.0 Compete With 2.0, Or Even 3.0?&lt;/strong&gt;

Google aren&#039;t even in the space with their Search.On his blog Evolving Trends, Marc Fawzi takes this thinking even further and suggests that Web 3.0 search engines will work more like Wikis:The emergence of a Wikipedia 3.0 that is built on the Semantic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can Google 1.0 Compete With 2.0, Or Even 3.0?</strong></p>
<p>Google aren&#8217;t even in the space with their Search.On his blog Evolving Trends, Marc Fawzi takes this thinking even further and suggests that Web 3.0 search engines will work more like Wikis:The emergence of a Wikipedia 3.0 that is built on the Semantic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSFK</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/06/google_cant_eve.html/comment-page-1#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>PSFK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can Google 1.0 Compete With 2.0, Or Even 3.0?&lt;/strong&gt;

The last 6 months has seen a seismic shift with the way people are using the web. We&#039;ve moved from a read to read-write web where users contribute to the experience whether that&#039;s through writing, uploading, sharing and, importantly, tagging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can Google 1.0 Compete With 2.0, Or Even 3.0?</strong></p>
<p>The last 6 months has seen a seismic shift with the way people are using the web. We&#8217;ve moved from a read to read-write web where users contribute to the experience whether that&#8217;s through writing, uploading, sharing and, importantly, tagging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
