<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brands Led Blindly Into Second Life Forest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html</link>
	<description>Good Ideas Report</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:35:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FC/Aki</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>FC/Aki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I find it amusing that the author of this article finds it so important that  a store in SL *not* have doors on it, when the whole concept of SL is to create constructs that may or may not *simulate* constructs in real life.  Is it so wrong for someone to want a door on their premises - to simulate the experience of a dwelling?  Or should we all go back to living as cave men and grunt and grown when someone puts something as simple as a door in an entranceway?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A quick glance at the author&#039;s avatar indicates he is not a newcomer to SL, and it should be safe to assume that the concept of griefers is not alien him, whether it be on SL or any other online game.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That the author chose to vent his frustrations over *one* griefer on the company itself is wholely irresponsible and completely irrelevant to the initial topic of in game branding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, being a customer who was in the store at the time, I have to say that the author was treated with the utmost respect by the company&#039;s representative, despite incredibly rude behaviour from said author.  The Telus representative also requested that the griefer leave (which he did).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would suggest that the author reassess his methods of evaluating in-game locations.  He professes to be &#039;fair&#039; with Telus, yet from the start he walked in with a biased attitude against the company, despite factors that were not completely in the control of the representative who was there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amusing that the author of this article finds it so important that  a store in SL *not* have doors on it, when the whole concept of SL is to create constructs that may or may not *simulate* constructs in real life.  Is it so wrong for someone to want a door on their premises &#8211; to simulate the experience of a dwelling?  Or should we all go back to living as cave men and grunt and grown when someone puts something as simple as a door in an entranceway?</p>
<p>A quick glance at the author&#8217;s avatar indicates he is not a newcomer to SL, and it should be safe to assume that the concept of griefers is not alien him, whether it be on SL or any other online game.</p>
<p>That the author chose to vent his frustrations over *one* griefer on the company itself is wholely irresponsible and completely irrelevant to the initial topic of in game branding.</p>
<p>Furthermore, being a customer who was in the store at the time, I have to say that the author was treated with the utmost respect by the company&#8217;s representative, despite incredibly rude behaviour from said author.  The Telus representative also requested that the griefer leave (which he did).</p>
<p>I would suggest that the author reassess his methods of evaluating in-game locations.  He professes to be &#8216;fair&#8217; with Telus, yet from the start he walked in with a biased attitude against the company, despite factors that were not completely in the control of the representative who was there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prokofy Neva</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>Prokofy Neva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree about the &#039;physics&#039; of the world. Malls without doors, that enable the avian creatures of SL who can FLY to fly up to a vendor or billboard or item -- will just do better. People also like RL versimilitude, but then it has to have excellent camera angles, i.e. head room, and lots of visibility. Yes, people do stuff like put giant high-heeled shoes on a store so people will fly up -- it can create a tacky landscape of course.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People also TP a lot so it&#039;s true that networking and being in groups and talking in chat is more important than a static visit to a store, pulling a body to a store and trapping it. The era of avatar-trapping with telehubs passed because a determined minority wouldn&#039;t allow that method to be used in retailing, even though vendors and shoppers themselves tolerated the experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On griefing the solution is not to ask for an &quot;SL Police Force&quot; created by residents -- these groups are often worse than the griefers themselves. I think the Lindens have to be challenged to do a better job of policing and publicizing of justice -- their Police Blotter is woefully inadequate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You don&#039;t get anywhere by pretending that this experience of being blown away in a store is somehow isolated. It&#039;s rampant. Deprecate push and teleport home. The weapons lobby and the tiny minority of people using elevators who requuire push shouldn&#039;t be allowed to destroy the SL experience for the majority of the public.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree about the &#8216;physics&#8217; of the world. Malls without doors, that enable the avian creatures of SL who can FLY to fly up to a vendor or billboard or item &#8212; will just do better. People also like RL versimilitude, but then it has to have excellent camera angles, i.e. head room, and lots of visibility. Yes, people do stuff like put giant high-heeled shoes on a store so people will fly up &#8212; it can create a tacky landscape of course.</p>
<p>People also TP a lot so it&#8217;s true that networking and being in groups and talking in chat is more important than a static visit to a store, pulling a body to a store and trapping it. The era of avatar-trapping with telehubs passed because a determined minority wouldn&#8217;t allow that method to be used in retailing, even though vendors and shoppers themselves tolerated the experience.</p>
<p>On griefing the solution is not to ask for an &#8220;SL Police Force&#8221; created by residents &#8212; these groups are often worse than the griefers themselves. I think the Lindens have to be challenged to do a better job of policing and publicizing of justice &#8212; their Police Blotter is woefully inadequate.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get anywhere by pretending that this experience of being blown away in a store is somehow isolated. It&#8217;s rampant. Deprecate push and teleport home. The weapons lobby and the tiny minority of people using elevators who requuire push shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to destroy the SL experience for the majority of the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Case</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good points. I agree that stores and brands need to do things a bit different in SL. Unfortunately, who ever manages that store didn&#039;t think to turn on Push Restrictions, so you wouldn&#039;t hae had that exprience of being blasted. I think you are right - they should not be copying the same model of the 90&#039;s where you make a site no one comes back to. They need to figure out how to integrate their brand into the SL experience, and fill a need. ie: Telus would be better served by making a licensing deal with Nexcom, one of the bigger phone companies in SL. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. I agree that stores and brands need to do things a bit different in SL. Unfortunately, who ever manages that store didn&#8217;t think to turn on Push Restrictions, so you wouldn&#8217;t hae had that exprience of being blasted. I think you are right &#8211; they should not be copying the same model of the 90&#8217;s where you make a site no one comes back to. They need to figure out how to integrate their brand into the SL experience, and fill a need. ie: Telus would be better served by making a licensing deal with Nexcom, one of the bigger phone companies in SL. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csven</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>csven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the bandwagon, Piers. There&#039;s ample room on board since most marketing and advertising types still seem to think of SL as a typical videogame where they just need to stick their brand as if it was a 30sec slot or a grafted addition to a standard FPS level.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reading all the truly worthless posts on this topic the last couple of weeks has been a refreshing reminder of why I left corporate life: new ideas are not welcome, especially if they require a new way of thinking or doing business. This most recent rush into SL is like giving canned goods to someone who has never heard of a can opener... and then rants about how hard it was to get at the food inside. Imagine what they&#039;ll do when the interface to the web is 3D and it isn&#039;t hosted by a company that does actually keep the peace. I can hardly wait.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the bandwagon, Piers. There&#8217;s ample room on board since most marketing and advertising types still seem to think of SL as a typical videogame where they just need to stick their brand as if it was a 30sec slot or a grafted addition to a standard FPS level.</p>
<p>Reading all the truly worthless posts on this topic the last couple of weeks has been a refreshing reminder of why I left corporate life: new ideas are not welcome, especially if they require a new way of thinking or doing business. This most recent rush into SL is like giving canned goods to someone who has never heard of a can opener&#8230; and then rants about how hard it was to get at the food inside. Imagine what they&#8217;ll do when the interface to the web is 3D and it isn&#8217;t hosted by a company that does actually keep the peace. I can hardly wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boliver Oddfellow</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Boliver Oddfellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is why I have been saying all along that brands, be they for or non profit need to abandon the if you build it they will come attitude.  The only way for a brand to succeed- to truly convey an experience - in a positive way is to adopt a dont sell me, play worth me manta.  You can&#039;t impart a fun positive brand forward experience without first creating one&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Boliver Oddfellow&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Experience Officer&lt;br /&gt;
Infinite Vision Media&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I have been saying all along that brands, be they for or non profit need to abandon the if you build it they will come attitude.  The only way for a brand to succeed- to truly convey an experience &#8211; in a positive way is to adopt a dont sell me, play worth me manta.  You can&#8217;t impart a fun positive brand forward experience without first creating one</p>
<p>Boliver Oddfellow<br />
Chief Experience Officer<br />
Infinite Vision Media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csven</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>csven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Boliver&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;btw, I defended you on one blog entry that ripped on your SLCC panel comments and claimed that the 4P&#039;s still applied. I don&#039;t think most people realize just what can actually be done in a virtual space. It&#039;s too far from the real world. They continue to import limitations that simply no longer apply (e.g. Distribution).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thing is, when Rapid Manufacturing starts to become a reality, those virtual possibilities start to leak into the Real World. We can forget factories altogether.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s so much more to this than people realize.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Boliver</p>
<p>btw, I defended you on one blog entry that ripped on your SLCC panel comments and claimed that the 4P&#8217;s still applied. I don&#8217;t think most people realize just what can actually be done in a virtual space. It&#8217;s too far from the real world. They continue to import limitations that simply no longer apply (e.g. Distribution).</p>
<p>Thing is, when Rapid Manufacturing starts to become a reality, those virtual possibilities start to leak into the Real World. We can forget factories altogether.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s so much more to this than people realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prokofy Neva</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Prokofy Neva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Forseti/Giff is just trying to help the Lindens sell islands here by trying to hype up the idea that the mainland is a grief-ridden dystopia. It&#039;s also more business for his company if he can persuade all these SL neophytes coming in that they need to have their hand held and need giant islands landscaped and developed for $18,000 to get their feet wet. They don&#039;t. I&#039;m glad Telus chose the mainland and they&#039;ll be better for it in the long run.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And PSFK unwittingly played into that &quot;blighted mainland&quot; stereotype by recounting the adventure with being blasted as if it&#039;s the constant norm in SL -- it isn&#039;t. BTW, putting on push restrictions doesn&#039;t fully prevent the experience of still being caged, smoked, and harassed in other ways.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The mainland has many well-kept areas where stores thrive -- I know because I own sims and keep them up and mytenants do well there. The mainland offers fly-bys and spontaneous connections and an open market, not the wall garden and gated community feel of the islands which are often empty stagesets devoid of traffic once the big media hit happens and the initial campaign is over.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, &quot;don&#039;t sell me, play with me&quot; is REALLY getting annoying to the point of nausea. Um, I don&#039;t want a clothing or cell phone company to play with me, thank you very much. No, do NOT play with me, dammit. Either go away, or produce something that fits with, and harmonizes with, the virtual world and my experience in it such that I would care to buy it, in the normal way, without fake &quot;play experiences&quot; like fake mass ecstasy at concerts or be-ins. Make something interest and witty and it will sell. Tie it to RL in some compelling and intriguing way, and it will sell. Learn about the world and how to do that and don&#039;t let all the sherpas filter your experience. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It will sell not in the old fashioned way of grabbing eyeballs, becaue they can&#039;t be grabbed in a world so atomized, and connected more by groups and networks than by proximity. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t sell, be. If you get the being part right, the selling will flow naturally. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forseti/Giff is just trying to help the Lindens sell islands here by trying to hype up the idea that the mainland is a grief-ridden dystopia. It&#8217;s also more business for his company if he can persuade all these SL neophytes coming in that they need to have their hand held and need giant islands landscaped and developed for $18,000 to get their feet wet. They don&#8217;t. I&#8217;m glad Telus chose the mainland and they&#8217;ll be better for it in the long run.</p>
<p>And PSFK unwittingly played into that &#8220;blighted mainland&#8221; stereotype by recounting the adventure with being blasted as if it&#8217;s the constant norm in SL &#8212; it isn&#8217;t. BTW, putting on push restrictions doesn&#8217;t fully prevent the experience of still being caged, smoked, and harassed in other ways.</p>
<p>The mainland has many well-kept areas where stores thrive &#8212; I know because I own sims and keep them up and mytenants do well there. The mainland offers fly-bys and spontaneous connections and an open market, not the wall garden and gated community feel of the islands which are often empty stagesets devoid of traffic once the big media hit happens and the initial campaign is over.</p>
<p>BTW, &#8220;don&#8217;t sell me, play with me&#8221; is REALLY getting annoying to the point of nausea. Um, I don&#8217;t want a clothing or cell phone company to play with me, thank you very much. No, do NOT play with me, dammit. Either go away, or produce something that fits with, and harmonizes with, the virtual world and my experience in it such that I would care to buy it, in the normal way, without fake &#8220;play experiences&#8221; like fake mass ecstasy at concerts or be-ins. Make something interest and witty and it will sell. Tie it to RL in some compelling and intriguing way, and it will sell. Learn about the world and how to do that and don&#8217;t let all the sherpas filter your experience. </p>
<p>It will sell not in the old fashioned way of grabbing eyeballs, becaue they can&#8217;t be grabbed in a world so atomized, and connected more by groups and networks than by proximity. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t sell, be. If you get the being part right, the selling will flow naturally. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Case</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this post may be informative to the discussion. check the comments.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.twistimage.com/blog/archives/000686.html&lt;br /&gt;
-max&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this post may be informative to the discussion. check the comments.<br />
<a href="http://www.twistimage.com/blog/archives/000686.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.twistimage.com/blog/archives/000686.html</a><br />
-max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator>Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1507</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Brands&lt;/strong&gt;

If a brand appears in Second Life and no-one is around, does it really exist? Good question. PSFK, is wondering what the heck is going on at Second Life. Real people are spending real money to enjoy a second life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Brands</strong></p>
<p>If a brand appears in Second Life and no-one is around, does it really exist? Good question. PSFK, is wondering what the heck is going on at Second Life. Real people are spending real money to enjoy a second life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSFK</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/brands_led_blin.html/comment-page-1#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator>PSFK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1508</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Second Life Forest: Electric Sheep Responds&lt;/strong&gt;

Giff Constable from leading SL &#039;agency&#039; dropped us a line with his thoughts about what we said about Second Life in our article, Brands Led Blindly Into Second Life Forest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Second Life Forest: Electric Sheep Responds</strong></p>
<p>Giff Constable from leading SL &#8216;agency&#8217; dropped us a line with his thoughts about what we said about Second Life in our article, Brands Led Blindly Into Second Life Forest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
