<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wild Fluctuations: Can We Trust Technorati&#8217;s Stats?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/wild_fluctuatio.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/wild_fluctuatio.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:51:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/wild_fluctuatio.html/comment-page-1#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The numbers are way overinflated.  And the disparities during the day that you reported are even more troubling.  The blogosphere may be growing, but at a much smaller factor than outlined by Tecnorati.  I myself have created over 30 blogs this year alone.  I post to maybe 3-4.  Thanks for the posting.  Your site is a great resource.  And btw, do you ever sleep? :) &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers are way overinflated.  And the disparities during the day that you reported are even more troubling.  The blogosphere may be growing, but at a much smaller factor than outlined by Tecnorati.  I myself have created over 30 blogs this year alone.  I post to maybe 3-4.  Thanks for the posting.  Your site is a great resource.  And btw, do you ever sleep? :) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sifry</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/wild_fluctuatio.html/comment-page-1#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sifry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Strange, and definitely points to some bug.  I&#039;ve asked our engineers to look into it immediately.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry about that!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dave&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, and definitely points to some bug.  I&#8217;ve asked our engineers to look into it immediately.</p>
<p>Sorry about that!</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/wild_fluctuatio.html/comment-page-1#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting timing as I had a similar question recently. Am waiting for a reply.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How is it possible 740 people link to my blog but in the RANK area (see grab below) only 629 blogs are shown to link? (grab: http://i5.tinypic.com/24653qe.gif)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Namaste&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Al&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting timing as I had a similar question recently. Am waiting for a reply.</p>
<p>How is it possible 740 people link to my blog but in the RANK area (see grab below) only 629 blogs are shown to link? (grab: <a href="http://i5.tinypic.com/24653qe.gif)" rel="nofollow">http://i5.tinypic.com/24653qe.gif)</a></p>
<p>Namaste</p>
<p>Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sifry</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/wild_fluctuatio.html/comment-page-1#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sifry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Al,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reason for the discrepancy is that the ranking is based on the number of blogs and links that have come to your blog in the last 6 months - so those numbers will be different than the number of posts that have a link to you, which is what the second number is...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&#039;re working on some fixes for the site that will make this difference (and explanation) more obvious.  Thanks for the comment!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dave&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al,</p>
<p>The reason for the discrepancy is that the ranking is based on the number of blogs and links that have come to your blog in the last 6 months &#8211; so those numbers will be different than the number of posts that have a link to you, which is what the second number is&#8230;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re working on some fixes for the site that will make this difference (and explanation) more obvious.  Thanks for the comment!</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
