<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome To WiLife: Apple&#8217;s  iTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2006/09/welcome_to_wili.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/09/welcome_to_wili.html</link>
	<description>Good Ideas Report</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:57:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: benjamin sochar</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/09/welcome_to_wili.html/comment-page-1#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin sochar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh Snap!  First comment.  Anyway I love Apple products (I spend about 10-12 hs a day on aMac), but this has to be the most disappointing product Apple has shown in a long time.  &lt;br /&gt;
1. The hard drive is for storing movies and TV shows off iTunes, it does NOT have a connection that allows you to &quot;Tivo&quot; programs (this would after all counter the purpose of the iTunes TV store).&lt;br /&gt;
2.  Apple only has distribution deals with Disney, which owns Miramax and Touchstone.  Other studios are hesitant to make deals with Apple as they receive higher profit margins from Big-box retailers.&lt;br /&gt;
3.  Due to bandwidth and storage issues movies are limited to 640x480 pixels.  These must be scaled up to watch on TVs bigger than these dimensions, causing a drop in quality.  Plus no HD, no Dolby digital.&lt;br /&gt;
4.  This does nothing my current cable provider doesn&#039;t do.  For the cost of my cable I can stream new releases and record or &quot;Tivo&quot; TV programs-all at broadband speeds.  I don&#039;t pay per show and  it would take me forever to download a movie or TV program over my crappy DSL (thanks SBC).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If only 17% of iPod owners buy music from iTunes and only 5% of the music on the average iPod is from iTunes-then how can iTV do better?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;sources: http://www.slate.com/id/2149572 , http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/06/AR2006090601972.html , http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/09/20/itvdominate/index.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Snap!  First comment.  Anyway I love Apple products (I spend about 10-12 hs a day on aMac), but this has to be the most disappointing product Apple has shown in a long time.  <br />
1. The hard drive is for storing movies and TV shows off iTunes, it does NOT have a connection that allows you to &#8220;Tivo&#8221; programs (this would after all counter the purpose of the iTunes TV store).<br />
2.  Apple only has distribution deals with Disney, which owns Miramax and Touchstone.  Other studios are hesitant to make deals with Apple as they receive higher profit margins from Big-box retailers.<br />
3.  Due to bandwidth and storage issues movies are limited to 640&#215;480 pixels.  These must be scaled up to watch on TVs bigger than these dimensions, causing a drop in quality.  Plus no HD, no Dolby digital.<br />
4.  This does nothing my current cable provider doesn&#8217;t do.  For the cost of my cable I can stream new releases and record or &#8220;Tivo&#8221; TV programs-all at broadband speeds.  I don&#8217;t pay per show and  it would take me forever to download a movie or TV program over my crappy DSL (thanks SBC).</p>
<p>If only 17% of iPod owners buy music from iTunes and only 5% of the music on the average iPod is from iTunes-then how can iTV do better?</p>
<p>sources: <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2149572" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2149572</a> , <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/06/AR2006090601972.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/06/AR2006090601972.html</a> , <a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/09/20/itvdominate/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/09/20/itvdominate/index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2006/09/welcome_to_wili.html/comment-page-1#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thanks. very informative. but I still think the wireless computer - tv connection is very interesting none the less.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks. very informative. but I still think the wireless computer &#8211; tv connection is very interesting none the less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
