Microsoft Drops Urban Spam Into Small Town

6 Responses to “Microsoft Drops Urban Spam Into Small Town”

1. Adam Rant
   Posted from: 198.70.9.2

   November 2nd, 2006 at 12:49 pm

   Sorry man but I hate that ‘Urban Spam’ tag.

   So is Bankys Urban Spam too?

   What about coprorate buildings?

   Any commercial communication in the public domain?
2. nick
   Posted from: 12.44.59.201

   November 2nd, 2006 at 12:57 pm

   I smell a rat - this looks surprisingly like a hoax of some kind. The second video is a little too staged…
3. Piers Fawkes
   Posted from: 66.151.115.66

   November 2nd, 2006 at 3:22 pm

   Adam, You drop crap on a town, it’s highly untargetted. The majority of people don’t need the product nor want it.

   Nick, maybe you’re right…
4. Piers Fawkes
   Posted from: 66.151.115.66

   November 2nd, 2006 at 3:27 pm

   not so much a hoax as a city collaboration with Mirosoft to influct urban spam on residents:

   http://www.wbbm780.com/pages/117187.php?contentType=4&contentId=231990
5. Uri
   Posted from: 130.161.236.103

   November 3rd, 2006 at 9:28 am

   I’m trying to figure out what Urban Spam is and what it’s not. It has to do with the content, format, and target audience. Take a look to the post “Defining Urban Spam” and contribute to the discussion.

   http://sustainablerotterdam.blogspot.com/2006/10/defining-urban-spam.html
6. lazlo pink
   Posted from: 67.70.205.183

   November 3rd, 2006 at 9:37 pm

   i believe that the term you’re looking for is litter.

Leave a Comment