<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Stripe: The Economist Branches Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2007/07/the-economist-branches-out.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/07/the-economist-branches-out.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:51:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lughenjo: crowdsourcing by The Economist Group &#171; walking without rhythm</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/07/the-economist-branches-out.html/comment-page-1#comment-5782</link>
		<dc:creator>Lughenjo: crowdsourcing by The Economist Group &#171; walking without rhythm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 10:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/07/the-economist-branches-out.html#comment-5782</guid>
		<description>[...] (from psfk.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (from psfk.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Media New Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/07/the-economist-branches-out.html/comment-page-1#comment-5760</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Media New Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/07/the-economist-branches-out.html#comment-5760</guid>
		<description>[...] Some are praising this magazine, largely known as THE source for free-market capitalism, for its decision to enter the world of charitable giving.  However, a lot of peopleare questioning why the world needs Lughenjo.  It seems the free-market capitalists in the bloggosphere are scoffing at the very idea that The Economistwould be asking them to rally around the idea of providing intelligence - to anybody - for free. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some are praising this magazine, largely known as THE source for free-market capitalism, for its decision to enter the world of charitable giving.  However, a lot of peopleare questioning why the world needs Lughenjo.  It seems the free-market capitalists in the bloggosphere are scoffing at the very idea that The Economistwould be asking them to rally around the idea of providing intelligence &#8211; to anybody &#8211; for free. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
