<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whatever Happened To&#8230;.. City Wide WiFi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-city-wide-wifi.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-city-wide-wifi.html</link>
	<description>Good Ideas Report</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:10:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sciannamea</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-city-wide-wifi.html/comment-page-1#comment-6824</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sciannamea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-city-wide-wifi.html#comment-6824</guid>
		<description>My take on this is that the cities and the companies they are partnering with have done a poor job of marketing muni WiFi to the end users--us. Plus, many cities have jumped on the bandwagon without doing their due diligence, just wanting to feel the &quot;coolness factor&quot; of citywide wireless. What needs to happen is that local governments have to sign on as anchor tenants, streamline services, and then that alone will do a better job of showing the public the benefits of a wireless network. One can only hope...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on this is that the cities and the companies they are partnering with have done a poor job of marketing muni WiFi to the end users&#8211;us. Plus, many cities have jumped on the bandwagon without doing their due diligence, just wanting to feel the &#8220;coolness factor&#8221; of citywide wireless. What needs to happen is that local governments have to sign on as anchor tenants, streamline services, and then that alone will do a better job of showing the public the benefits of a wireless network. One can only hope&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
