<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why 80s Art Is Vital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html</link>
	<description>Good Ideas Report</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:09:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Margherita</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html/comment-page-1#comment-8348</link>
		<dc:creator>Margherita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html#comment-8348</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a cycle. Now there&#039;s an &#039;80s revival (after being critized), before it was &#039;70s,&#039;60s and so on. Nothing new under the sun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a cycle. Now there&#8217;s an &#8217;80s revival (after being critized), before it was &#8217;70s,&#8217;60s and so on. Nothing new under the sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margherita</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html/comment-page-1#comment-8347</link>
		<dc:creator>Margherita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html#comment-8347</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a cicle. Now there&#039;s an &#039;80s revival (after being critized), before it was &#039;70s,&#039;60s and so on. Nothing new under the sun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a cicle. Now there&#8217;s an &#8217;80s revival (after being critized), before it was &#8217;70s,&#8217;60s and so on. Nothing new under the sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadawan</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html/comment-page-1#comment-8322</link>
		<dc:creator>Dadawan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html#comment-8322</guid>
		<description>Very interesting point of view; 80&#039;s art is underestimated, so does fashion and music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting point of view; 80&#8217;s art is underestimated, so does fashion and music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html/comment-page-1#comment-8312</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/10/why-80s-art-is-vital.html#comment-8312</guid>
		<description>Cyndi Lauper was huge in the 80&#039;s. I am glad that she is still around making wonderful music!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyndi Lauper was huge in the 80&#8217;s. I am glad that she is still around making wonderful music!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
