<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambient Social Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html</link>
	<description>Good Ideas Report</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:27:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sticking with the Social Media Theme &#171; eyecube</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-104958</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticking with the Social Media Theme &#171; eyecube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-104958</guid>
		<description>[...] exactly to all these Facebook status updates and Twitterings add up to?&#0160;&#0160;Does this Ambient Social Activity&#0160;provide real benefits?&#0160;What does all this passively active behaviour mean for brands? (The second [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exactly to all these Facebook status updates and Twitterings add up to?&#0160;&#0160;Does this Ambient Social Activity&#0160;provide real benefits?&#0160;What does all this passively active behaviour mean for brands? (The second [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Paul’s Reach &#187; Scarcity, value &#38; the nature of attention</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-12360</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Paul’s Reach &#187; Scarcity, value &#38; the nature of attention</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-12360</guid>
		<description>[...] type of attention do these customers exhibit (full, continuous partial, single transactional, ambient passive, recurring on-demand) &amp; can you either engage with it or actually move a customer one one form [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] type of attention do these customers exhibit (full, continuous partial, single transactional, ambient passive, recurring on-demand) &amp; can you either engage with it or actually move a customer one one form [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Paul’s Reach</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-12330</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Paul’s Reach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-12330</guid>
		<description>[...] type of attention do these customers exhibit (full, continuous partial, single transactional, ambient passive, recurring on-demand) &amp; can you either engage with it or actually move a customer one one form [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] type of attention do these customers exhibit (full, continuous partial, single transactional, ambient passive, recurring on-demand) &amp; can you either engage with it or actually move a customer one one form [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Paul’s Reach &#187; Links - Week ending 07/12/07</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-10393</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Paul’s Reach &#187; Links - Week ending 07/12/07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-10393</guid>
		<description>[...] 2 - Ambient social activity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2 &#8211; Ambient social activity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-9873</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-9873</guid>
		<description>Great post, Colin.

The comparison to &quot;leaving the TV on in the background&quot; is particularly interesting, especially as those of us raised on TV turn to the internet for entertainment more and more (the only reason I have a TV, it seems, is to watch movies, HBO series, and baseball).

My only argument would be that the internet-TV simile doesn&#039;t match up. The internet is an engaging medium whereas the TV is passive -- at best you get a mute button. So what you&#039;re really talking about with Twitter is &quot;passive engagement.&quot; The people Twittering are highly active.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Colin.</p>
<p>The comparison to &#8220;leaving the TV on in the background&#8221; is particularly interesting, especially as those of us raised on TV turn to the internet for entertainment more and more (the only reason I have a TV, it seems, is to watch movies, HBO series, and baseball).</p>
<p>My only argument would be that the internet-TV simile doesn&#8217;t match up. The internet is an engaging medium whereas the TV is passive &#8212; at best you get a mute button. So what you&#8217;re really talking about with Twitter is &#8220;passive engagement.&#8221; The people Twittering are highly active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-9872</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-9872</guid>
		<description>Great post, Colin.

The comparison to &quot;leaving the TV on in the background&quot; is particularly interesting, especially as those of us raised on TV turn to the internet for entertainment more and more (the only reason I have a TV, it seems, is to watch movies, HBO series, and baseball).

My only argument would be that the internet-TV simile doesn&#039;t match up. The internet is an engaging medium whereas the TV is passive -- at best you get a mute button. So what they&#039;re really talking about with Twitter is &quot;passive engagement.&quot; The people Twittering are highly active.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Colin.</p>
<p>The comparison to &#8220;leaving the TV on in the background&#8221; is particularly interesting, especially as those of us raised on TV turn to the internet for entertainment more and more (the only reason I have a TV, it seems, is to watch movies, HBO series, and baseball).</p>
<p>My only argument would be that the internet-TV simile doesn&#8217;t match up. The internet is an engaging medium whereas the TV is passive &#8212; at best you get a mute button. So what they&#8217;re really talking about with Twitter is &#8220;passive engagement.&#8221; The people Twittering are highly active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-11-16</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-9865</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-11-16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-9865</guid>
		<description>[...] Ambient Social Activity on PSFK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ambient Social Activity on PSFK [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
