<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambient Social Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:51:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sticking with the Social Media Theme &#171; eyecube</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-104958</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticking with the Social Media Theme &#171; eyecube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-104958</guid>
		<description>[...] exactly to all these Facebook status updates and Twitterings add up to?  Does this Ambient Social Activity provide real benefits? What does all this passively active behaviour mean for brands? (The second [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exactly to all these Facebook status updates and Twitterings add up to?  Does this Ambient Social Activity provide real benefits? What does all this passively active behaviour mean for brands? (The second [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Paul&#8217;s Reach &#187; Scarcity, value &#38; the nature of attention</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-12360</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Paul&#8217;s Reach &#187; Scarcity, value &#38; the nature of attention</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-12360</guid>
		<description>[...] type of attention do these customers exhibit (full, continuous partial, single transactional, ambient passive, recurring on-demand) &amp; can you either engage with it or actually move a customer one one form [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] type of attention do these customers exhibit (full, continuous partial, single transactional, ambient passive, recurring on-demand) &amp; can you either engage with it or actually move a customer one one form [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Paul&#8217;s Reach</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-12330</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Paul&#8217;s Reach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-12330</guid>
		<description>[...] type of attention do these customers exhibit (full, continuous partial, single transactional, ambient passive, recurring on-demand) &amp; can you either engage with it or actually move a customer one one form [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] type of attention do these customers exhibit (full, continuous partial, single transactional, ambient passive, recurring on-demand) &amp; can you either engage with it or actually move a customer one one form [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Paul&#8217;s Reach &#187; Links - Week ending 07/12/07</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-10393</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Paul&#8217;s Reach &#187; Links - Week ending 07/12/07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-10393</guid>
		<description>[...] 2 - Ambient social activity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2 &#8211; Ambient social activity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-9873</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-9873</guid>
		<description>Great post, Colin.

The comparison to &quot;leaving the TV on in the background&quot; is particularly interesting, especially as those of us raised on TV turn to the internet for entertainment more and more (the only reason I have a TV, it seems, is to watch movies, HBO series, and baseball).

My only argument would be that the internet-TV simile doesn&#039;t match up. The internet is an engaging medium whereas the TV is passive -- at best you get a mute button. So what you&#039;re really talking about with Twitter is &quot;passive engagement.&quot; The people Twittering are highly active.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Colin.</p>
<p>The comparison to &#8220;leaving the TV on in the background&#8221; is particularly interesting, especially as those of us raised on TV turn to the internet for entertainment more and more (the only reason I have a TV, it seems, is to watch movies, HBO series, and baseball).</p>
<p>My only argument would be that the internet-TV simile doesn&#8217;t match up. The internet is an engaging medium whereas the TV is passive &#8212; at best you get a mute button. So what you&#8217;re really talking about with Twitter is &#8220;passive engagement.&#8221; The people Twittering are highly active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-9872</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-9872</guid>
		<description>Great post, Colin.

The comparison to &quot;leaving the TV on in the background&quot; is particularly interesting, especially as those of us raised on TV turn to the internet for entertainment more and more (the only reason I have a TV, it seems, is to watch movies, HBO series, and baseball).

My only argument would be that the internet-TV simile doesn&#039;t match up. The internet is an engaging medium whereas the TV is passive -- at best you get a mute button. So what they&#039;re really talking about with Twitter is &quot;passive engagement.&quot; The people Twittering are highly active.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Colin.</p>
<p>The comparison to &#8220;leaving the TV on in the background&#8221; is particularly interesting, especially as those of us raised on TV turn to the internet for entertainment more and more (the only reason I have a TV, it seems, is to watch movies, HBO series, and baseball).</p>
<p>My only argument would be that the internet-TV simile doesn&#8217;t match up. The internet is an engaging medium whereas the TV is passive &#8212; at best you get a mute button. So what they&#8217;re really talking about with Twitter is &#8220;passive engagement.&#8221; The people Twittering are highly active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-11-16</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html/comment-page-1#comment-9865</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-11-16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2007/11/ambient-social-activity.html#comment-9865</guid>
		<description>[...] Ambient Social Activity on PSFK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ambient Social Activity on PSFK [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
