<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The PSFK Editorial Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:23:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Floyd Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html/comment-page-1#comment-11105</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html#comment-11105</guid>
		<description>Well said GreenGiant

I was involved (albeit as a child) with the 80&#039;s green movements due to my upbringing. The sanctimonious, &#039;holier than thou&#039; attitude that seemed to become the soul of the movement really turned me off as I hit my teens.

It&#039;s only lately I realized you can&#039;t pander to that attitude - all you can do is be as considerate as possible and try your best to make things better for yourself and those around you.

I feel this is what PSFK does admirably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said GreenGiant</p>
<p>I was involved (albeit as a child) with the 80&#8217;s green movements due to my upbringing. The sanctimonious, &#8216;holier than thou&#8217; attitude that seemed to become the soul of the movement really turned me off as I hit my teens.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only lately I realized you can&#8217;t pander to that attitude &#8211; all you can do is be as considerate as possible and try your best to make things better for yourself and those around you.</p>
<p>I feel this is what PSFK does admirably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html/comment-page-1#comment-11085</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html#comment-11085</guid>
		<description>However people want to interpret &#039;ours&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However people want to interpret &#8216;ours&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh Spear</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html/comment-page-1#comment-11081</link>
		<dc:creator>josh Spear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html#comment-11081</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s our site, not yours.&quot; 

Surely you don&#039;t mean that how many will interpret it Piers.  

Without your readers, you&#039;d be nowhere fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s our site, not yours.&#8221; </p>
<p>Surely you don&#8217;t mean that how many will interpret it Piers.  </p>
<p>Without your readers, you&#8217;d be nowhere fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html/comment-page-1#comment-11076</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html#comment-11076</guid>
		<description>What can you say?  You cannot please everyone.  Nor should you try.  Some posts are just meant to make people think and then act.  Not just act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can you say?  You cannot please everyone.  Nor should you try.  Some posts are just meant to make people think and then act.  Not just act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenGiant</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html/comment-page-1#comment-11070</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenGiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html#comment-11070</guid>
		<description>Great post, Piers. But trying to please green fascists is an exercise in banging your head against the wall. They are divorced form reality and will never be satisfied. Never. Progress will come from forward thinkers who can integrate technology, reforms, change, and the way real people actually live. If greenies continue to get so wrapped up in radical perfection, the green movement will quickly lose the prominence it has recently gained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Piers. But trying to please green fascists is an exercise in banging your head against the wall. They are divorced form reality and will never be satisfied. Never. Progress will come from forward thinkers who can integrate technology, reforms, change, and the way real people actually live. If greenies continue to get so wrapped up in radical perfection, the green movement will quickly lose the prominence it has recently gained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html/comment-page-1#comment-11069</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html#comment-11069</guid>
		<description>A) I shouldn&#039;t have used motorola as an example - it was open to attack. 

B) We&#039;re not journalists. we&#039;re PSFK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A) I shouldn&#8217;t have used motorola as an example &#8211; it was open to attack. </p>
<p>B) We&#8217;re not journalists. we&#8217;re PSFK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html/comment-page-1#comment-11068</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/01/the-psfk-editorial-policy.html#comment-11068</guid>
		<description>&quot;PSFK’s aim is to inspire our readers to make change to make things better.&quot;

Just report the news and get over yourselves. The role of journalists is to inform, period.

&quot;Yes, there are eco issues too but at the end of the day, Apple makes 1 version of its phone, Motorola makes hundreds of phones that have limited shelf lives.&quot;

Apple addresses exactly one segment of the mobile phone market. Motorola addresses lots of different segments, and it&#039;s not like their phones self-destruct after 6 months. You think Apple isn&#039;t ever going to come out with a new iPhone or a range of iPhones? Just look at the iPod range.

You also said that you wrote about the iPhone because it&#039;s &quot;culturally and technically significant&quot;. Would it be less so if it came in 20 different versions? Would you still cover it? Yes.

If Motorola came out with cool products that were as well branded as Apple&#039;s, you&#039;d be all over them just the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;PSFK’s aim is to inspire our readers to make change to make things better.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just report the news and get over yourselves. The role of journalists is to inform, period.</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, there are eco issues too but at the end of the day, Apple makes 1 version of its phone, Motorola makes hundreds of phones that have limited shelf lives.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apple addresses exactly one segment of the mobile phone market. Motorola addresses lots of different segments, and it&#8217;s not like their phones self-destruct after 6 months. You think Apple isn&#8217;t ever going to come out with a new iPhone or a range of iPhones? Just look at the iPod range.</p>
<p>You also said that you wrote about the iPhone because it&#8217;s &#8220;culturally and technically significant&#8221;. Would it be less so if it came in 20 different versions? Would you still cover it? Yes.</p>
<p>If Motorola came out with cool products that were as well branded as Apple&#8217;s, you&#8217;d be all over them just the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
