<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast Company&#8217;s Dull Top 50 Innovative Companies 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:14:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Third Place</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-12290</link>
		<dc:creator>The Third Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html#comment-12290</guid>
		<description>I too thought the list was obvious, but liked what they had to say about Anomaly. Specifically, Anomaly&#039;s spin-off, &#039;Another Anomaly&#039;, which is a terrific example of staying true to your corporate mission.

By interrogating their own business model they&#039;ve managed to stay fresh, innovative and relevant.

I recently wrote a post about this topic and the need to construct, breakdown and reconstruct your business model every 6-18 months at: http://thethirdplace.bradleykay.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too thought the list was obvious, but liked what they had to say about Anomaly. Specifically, Anomaly&#8217;s spin-off, &#8216;Another Anomaly&#8217;, which is a terrific example of staying true to your corporate mission.</p>
<p>By interrogating their own business model they&#8217;ve managed to stay fresh, innovative and relevant.</p>
<p>I recently wrote a post about this topic and the need to construct, breakdown and reconstruct your business model every 6-18 months at: <a href="http://thethirdplace.bradleykay.com" rel="nofollow">http://thethirdplace.bradleykay.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JE Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-11993</link>
		<dc:creator>JE Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html#comment-11993</guid>
		<description>wal-mart?  please......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wal-mart?  please&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent van Wylick</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-11956</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent van Wylick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html#comment-11956</guid>
		<description>Love it! I&#039;m particularly impressed with that you actually linked to the 50 companies, which the hater above me neglected to mention. After all you can just google FC…

I&#039;d love a less dull list from you now please! Much lower on the fmcg-focus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it! I&#8217;m particularly impressed with that you actually linked to the 50 companies, which the hater above me neglected to mention. After all you can just google FC…</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love a less dull list from you now please! Much lower on the fmcg-focus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hm</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-11937</link>
		<dc:creator>hm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/02/fast-companys-dull-top-50-innovative-companies-2008.html#comment-11937</guid>
		<description>So you swapped Boeing and LG? And listed irobot 4 times? And added yourself?

And didn&#039;t even link the actual article?
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/123/the-worlds-most-innovative-companies.html

Congrats on a witty and mature post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you swapped Boeing and LG? And listed irobot 4 times? And added yourself?</p>
<p>And didn&#8217;t even link the actual article?<br />
<a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/123/the-worlds-most-innovative-companies.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/123/the-worlds-most-innovative-companies.html</a></p>
<p>Congrats on a witty and mature post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
