<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Grant Responds To Organic Food&#8217;s Carbon Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2008/05/john-grant-responds-to-organic-carbon-issue.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/05/john-grant-responds-to-organic-carbon-issue.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:51:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john grant</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/05/john-grant-responds-to-organic-carbon-issue.html/comment-page-1#comment-14368</link>
		<dc:creator>john grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/05/john-grant-responds-to-organic-carbon-issue.html#comment-14368</guid>
		<description>It was that spin doctor from the British Poultry Council I was really responding to, obviously :) - the only reason organic chicken (which in the UK means free range as well) had a bigger average footprint in the UK government study he was quoting was that it had a longer lifetime as well as a considerably happier one. If you buy from a local butcher/market who source from local farms (rather than national grocery chains who even in the UK have 800 mile long supply chains for fresh food) I suspect you could more than compensate for those few kg of carbon, and anyway 45% of a small number isn&#039;t very much :J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was that spin doctor from the British Poultry Council I was really responding to, obviously :) &#8211; the only reason organic chicken (which in the UK means free range as well) had a bigger average footprint in the UK government study he was quoting was that it had a longer lifetime as well as a considerably happier one. If you buy from a local butcher/market who source from local farms (rather than national grocery chains who even in the UK have 800 mile long supply chains for fresh food) I suspect you could more than compensate for those few kg of carbon, and anyway 45% of a small number isn&#8217;t very much :J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john grant</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/05/john-grant-responds-to-organic-carbon-issue.html/comment-page-1#comment-14367</link>
		<dc:creator>john grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/05/john-grant-responds-to-organic-carbon-issue.html#comment-14367</guid>
		<description>It was that spin doctor from the British Poultry Council I was really responding to, obviously :) - the only reason organic chicken (which in the UK means free range as well) had a bigger average footprint was in the UK government study he was quoting was that it had a longer lifetime as well as a considerably happier one. If you buy from a local butcher/market who source from local farms (rather than national grocery chains who even in the UK have 800 mile long supply chains for fresh food) I suspect you could more than compensate for those few kg of carbon, and anyway 45% of a small number isn&#039;t very much :J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was that spin doctor from the British Poultry Council I was really responding to, obviously :) &#8211; the only reason organic chicken (which in the UK means free range as well) had a bigger average footprint was in the UK government study he was quoting was that it had a longer lifetime as well as a considerably happier one. If you buy from a local butcher/market who source from local farms (rather than national grocery chains who even in the UK have 800 mile long supply chains for fresh food) I suspect you could more than compensate for those few kg of carbon, and anyway 45% of a small number isn&#8217;t very much :J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
