<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slaves To Technology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2008/09/slaves-to-technology.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/09/slaves-to-technology.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:14:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zelzal 220</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/09/slaves-to-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-193475</link>
		<dc:creator>zelzal 220</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=14681#comment-193475</guid>
		<description>If we don&#039;t think at all and listen to computers call , the power of our land will be in computers hand . So , we should fight against the commands of industry technical slavery .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we don&#8217;t think at all and listen to computers call , the power of our land will be in computers hand . So , we should fight against the commands of industry technical slavery .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/09/slaves-to-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-121295</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=14681#comment-121295</guid>
		<description>Kurtzweil  pointed out in The Singularity is Near that over 50% of human to human communications are via AI or software.

How true and how strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurtzweil  pointed out in The Singularity is Near that over 50% of human to human communications are via AI or software.</p>
<p>How true and how strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Number9</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/09/slaves-to-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-121182</link>
		<dc:creator>Number9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=14681#comment-121182</guid>
		<description>&quot;He could take a stack of numbers as long as his arm, run his finger down them like a blind man reading braille, and add them up faster than anyone could punch them into an adding machine&quot;

But is this intelligence?

Humans are good at things like analysis, problem-solving, and making policy judgments. Why should we spend our time on computation when we can direct our energies toward the larger issue we want to address? Calculators are infinitely better than humans at doing this sort of thing, so why shouldn&#039;t we embrace their efficiency? We should certainly understand the how and why of mathematical functions, understand which ones to use when, and so on, but do we really need to write out every multiplication and division problem that arises? Should we give up matches so that we don&#039;t lose the knowledge of how to make fire with sticks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He could take a stack of numbers as long as his arm, run his finger down them like a blind man reading braille, and add them up faster than anyone could punch them into an adding machine&#8221;</p>
<p>But is this intelligence?</p>
<p>Humans are good at things like analysis, problem-solving, and making policy judgments. Why should we spend our time on computation when we can direct our energies toward the larger issue we want to address? Calculators are infinitely better than humans at doing this sort of thing, so why shouldn&#8217;t we embrace their efficiency? We should certainly understand the how and why of mathematical functions, understand which ones to use when, and so on, but do we really need to write out every multiplication and division problem that arises? Should we give up matches so that we don&#8217;t lose the knowledge of how to make fire with sticks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/09/slaves-to-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-121134</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=14681#comment-121134</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s extremely obvious in our schools and with recent grads.  the generation that knows more than any other generation...but understands nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s extremely obvious in our schools and with recent grads.  the generation that knows more than any other generation&#8230;but understands nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
