<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q: Should PSFK Launch An Iconoculture Style Service For 2009?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2008/10/q-should-psfk-launch-an-iconoculture-style-service-for-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/10/q-should-psfk-launch-an-iconoculture-style-service-for-2009.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:50:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/10/q-should-psfk-launch-an-iconoculture-style-service-for-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-157623</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/10/q-should-psfk-launch-an-iconoculture-style-service-for-2009.html#comment-157623</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a weekly reader of iconoculture and i don&#039;t have such critics about it as some of those people have. I agree with andy that i take iconoculture as what it is, a souurce of (in my case) research. The only thing about iconoculture is the lack of &quot;connectivism&quot;, they could be a little more smart and useful if they link everything not only in their macrotrends, but also in the way they write every article, might be a kind of advise if you want to pursue de same model, i&#039;d like that, but remember connectivity between findings, or it will become a fad feeder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a weekly reader of iconoculture and i don&#8217;t have such critics about it as some of those people have. I agree with andy that i take iconoculture as what it is, a souurce of (in my case) research. The only thing about iconoculture is the lack of &#8220;connectivism&#8221;, they could be a little more smart and useful if they link everything not only in their macrotrends, but also in the way they write every article, might be a kind of advise if you want to pursue de same model, i&#8217;d like that, but remember connectivity between findings, or it will become a fad feeder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2008/10/q-should-psfk-launch-an-iconoculture-style-service-for-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-155977</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/2008/10/q-should-psfk-launch-an-iconoculture-style-service-for-2009.html#comment-155977</guid>
		<description>yes!  I actually like iconoculture, they package their stuff well.  It often is too granular, as much fad as trend but I take it for what it is.  It&#039;s another source of inspiration.  I miss it as a free-agent planner and consultant now. Like forrester, jupiter, GFK, etc once you leave these agency/client mother ships getting access to any insightful data  beyond blog commentary is tough.  psfk could fill a huge void and use meta-insight from the posts you already have to provide an even longer view.
go for it piers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes!  I actually like iconoculture, they package their stuff well.  It often is too granular, as much fad as trend but I take it for what it is.  It&#8217;s another source of inspiration.  I miss it as a free-agent planner and consultant now. Like forrester, jupiter, GFK, etc once you leave these agency/client mother ships getting access to any insightful data  beyond blog commentary is tough.  psfk could fill a huge void and use meta-insight from the posts you already have to provide an even longer view.<br />
go for it piers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
