<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sending Emails Via Semantic Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psfk.com/2009/01/sending-emails-via-semantic-search.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psfk.com/2009/01/sending-emails-via-semantic-search.html</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:20:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2009/01/sending-emails-via-semantic-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-248699</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=24714#comment-248699</guid>
		<description>Heywood, I&#039;m with you, first instinct is SPAMMERS DELIGHT... how is it possible to delete any outdated information.  Could mean an end to storing archives, and don&#039;t we want to be able to check into history now and again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heywood, I&#8217;m with you, first instinct is SPAMMERS DELIGHT&#8230; how is it possible to delete any outdated information.  Could mean an end to storing archives, and don&#8217;t we want to be able to check into history now and again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia Sugarman</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2009/01/sending-emails-via-semantic-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-248657</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia Sugarman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=24714#comment-248657</guid>
		<description>Yep, this is a can of worms that really needs a lot of directions and cautions printed on the label, only available with a very special coupon. In the right hands it could be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, this is a can of worms that really needs a lot of directions and cautions printed on the label, only available with a very special coupon. In the right hands it could be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Iremonger</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2009/01/sending-emails-via-semantic-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-248512</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Iremonger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=24714#comment-248512</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a powerful new revenue stream for Google!  

As a tool for controlled groups there might be some value, but agree this sounds like a spam tool made in heaven.  How much different will it be from a &#039;cold email list&#039; assembled against a set criteria?  

Hard to see any real benefit for recipients...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a powerful new revenue stream for Google!  </p>
<p>As a tool for controlled groups there might be some value, but agree this sounds like a spam tool made in heaven.  How much different will it be from a &#8216;cold email list&#8217; assembled against a set criteria?  </p>
<p>Hard to see any real benefit for recipients&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heywood Jablowme</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2009/01/sending-emails-via-semantic-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-248508</link>
		<dc:creator>Heywood Jablowme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=24714#comment-248508</guid>
		<description>Spammers rejoice!  Now you can clog email systems without having to collect email addresses!  Does anyone look to see if something should be done, not just if it can be done?  Of course this will spawn a new software industry aimed at blocking SEAmail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spammers rejoice!  Now you can clog email systems without having to collect email addresses!  Does anyone look to see if something should be done, not just if it can be done?  Of course this will spawn a new software industry aimed at blocking SEAmail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semantische Zielgruppenbildung: &#8220;Alle Kunden aus NRW, die sich im letzten Monat neu angemeldet haben&#8221; - Email Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.psfk.com/2009/01/sending-emails-via-semantic-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-248493</link>
		<dc:creator>Semantische Zielgruppenbildung: &#8220;Alle Kunden aus NRW, die sich im letzten Monat neu angemeldet haben&#8221; - Email Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psfk.com/?p=24714#comment-248493</guid>
		<description>[...] Sending Emails Via Semantic Search    Kategorien : Allgemein   Artikel bookmarken: delicious &#124; Google &#124; Mister [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sending Emails Via Semantic Search    Kategorien : Allgemein   Artikel bookmarken: delicious | Google | Mister [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
