
Now that designer style has become so accessible, thanks to fast fashion knock offs, everyone looks the same. In his book Paris New York Shanghai‘, Dutch conceptual artist Hans Eijkelboom intricately proves that although people perceive themselves as being very independent, they actually look very much alike.
Which is what’s so disappointing about designers like Christian Lacroix and Martin Margiela throwing in the proverbial shoulder pad. While I’m all for fashion democracy, the loss of transgressive designers inches us even closer to cultural mediocrity.
I’ve been egged on by the brilliant BBC2 series British Style Genius, specifically the interviews with Westwood and McLaren about the rise of their anarchy, and the historical camaraderie of various sub-cultures who were united by a look.
In tracing back through vintage fashion culture, it’s easy to spot that fashion sub-cultures don’t exist as they used to. Who stands out in a way that really impacts culture these days, like the mods, punks and dandies did the first time round? I’ve been searching for people who don’t look like a hipster, or the Connecticut housewives version of a hipster as styled by Vogue, but even hip-hop is more like hipster-hop these days. Which is creatively depressing to me because fashion has become more like a commodity.
Where’s the attitude and energy that pioneers like Westwood and McLaren created? Where are the extremes that make fashion and the culture it creates exciting and inspiring?
Is Creativity is Still Alive?
Of course there are brilliant designers creating unique clothes and creativity, I put Gareth Pugh at the top of this list, but something’s getting lost in translation, and when we’re done mixing and matching, the result is, well, beige. We end up looking the same.
Raoul Shah, the CEO of Exposure, an interactive communications, reassures me that, “Creativity is still alive and well in every corner of our planet. It’s just harder to spot”.
It’s harder to spot because the business savvy of H+M, Target and Top Shop etc, who commercialize the talents of niche designers, is so overpowering. I seriously question the millions of dollars spent on consumer research that claims today’s fashion conscious consumer is independent and in charge of their own unique identity, and Eijkelboom’s work proves it. The influence of creative extremes is being watered down to lowest common denominator before it’s had a chance to challenge us, and it’s culturally stifling.
Fast Fashion
Julie Ragolia, City Magazine’s Fashion Director doesn’t think the fast fashion houses are to fault for such a hegemony. “The issue is more sociological as people look to less varied sources for fashion inspiration. Fast fashion retailers offer styles that easily support individuated style, but that consumers should opt toward the same racks is curious to me”.
Rather than pushing varying shades of beige, the goliaths of fast fashion have the power to inspire sub-cultural identities with a more diverse fashion democracy, but crucially, without biting the hand that feeds.
Simon Doonan, creative director of Barney’s says, “Today’s fashion landscape is vast. The old frameworks no longer apply. We need to approach it without any preconceived ideas”.
The challenge for fast fashion is to evolve beyond the tired capsule collection marketing machine, that keeps us stuck in this cultural rut. Jimmy Choo for H+M, (sigh).
John Lee, publisher of Theme magazine points out that fast fashion brands may churn clothes out quickly, but they’re slow to step up their marketing game. “If they were really smart, they would use their re-invention opportunities to create content which break them out of the rest of the mainstream, (and I’m not talking streetwear collaborations, or large music sponsorships)”.
According to Shah, “smart entrepreneurs are still ready to back new ideas”.
Whoever proves to be the smartest entrepreneur, better do it fast.
Gill writes about what’s happening in the business of fashion for the fashion trend forecasting site Mudpie.co.uk. If you’re not a paid up subscriber of Mudpie, you can now read her musings here on PSFK.
Gill is the co-founder of The Joneses. Contact her at Gill@thejoneses-nyc.com












I think the same is true across the spectrum of cultural expression. The distance between subversion and commodity is short, if it exists at all. Even more troubling is the trend toward manufactured culture mentioned here that creates an illusory explosion of production and choice but little innovation.
July 15th, 2009 at 12:31 pm
@John – Great point, very true.
July 15th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
I see this dilemma as a fantastic opportunity…. the gap is so great that raw talent is easily recognised. If everyone looks the same it’s really easy to look different.
July 16th, 2009 at 3:53 am