Information Addiction and Our Quest for Relevancy

4  comments
Share

89021658

Image credit: Getty Images, Craig P. Jewell/Flickr

Turns out there might be a biological imperative to explain our addiction to information that leads us to obsessively check our Facebook profiles for updates and inexplicably lose hours at a time searching for obscure bits of information on Google. Scientists refer to this desire as seeking or wanting, a practice that affects the dopamine centers of our brains and causes us to chase the potential reward just around the corner rather than settle for the tangible one right in front of us. This quest for what might be, creates a seemingly infinite feedback loop where consumption continuously renews the appetite.

Slate explains how this idea is fueled by our culture of increasing immediacy and mobility, where small cues that some new piece of data might be coming – a buzz before a text message or a bell prompting a new email – make the prospect even more enticing:

Since we’re restless, easily bored creatures, our gadgets give us in abundance qualities the seeking/wanting system finds particularly exciting. Novelty is one. Panksepp says the dopamine system is activated by finding something unexpected or by the anticipation of something new. If the rewards come unpredictably—as e-mail, texts, updates do—we get even more carried away.

And while we may be predisposed to rely on a constant stream of information, apparently not all bits are created equal. Apparently, our brains tend to crave a degree of what is personal and local, which is to say, more of what we already know. An idea that contrasts with the ideal of individual as information omnivore, constantly seeking out all perspectives on a particular subject, even if they’re different from their own.

A fact that if true, goes a long way towards explaining the effectiveness of the so-called politics of disinformation being perpetrated throughout the media and why cutting through that can be so problematic. Perhaps, this is why comedy as an antidote works better than appealing to flat out reason, the underlying perspective is delivered in a novel way.

This idea of relevancy in our insatiable quest for information also has implications for the future of the internet, supporting the theory of the “social web” as the next evolution online. If all of our information is eventually filtered through our network of contacts and friends, then it has the potential to further notions of connectedness and pertinence on one hand, while simultaneously widening the gulf between divergent points of view. An interesting paradox for the digital age, particularly in the face of our shrinking, global world.

Slate: Seeking

Frontal Cortex: Information Addiction

flickrpsfk12

You're reading PSFK.

Inspiration to make things better.

Comments (4)

  1. Yes…but you fail to explain how I can adequately monetize this biological imperative towards online obsession. Or did you?

    Honestly I just twitted this article without even reading it. It’s like…why even read anything when I can just copy and paste the link into my Tumblr and then write a witty comment in hopes that someone will click the link to my blog?

    If I had taken the time to read this article, I would have lost those precious few seconds that divide me from the rest of the rat race. You’ve got to be pragmatic if you want to make decent Adsense money, and frankly, reading just feels like another outmoded component of the “old media” that will die once we start communicating through constant livevlog.

  2. There was a US time use survey showing a decrease in leisure time due to 3 hours of home IT time which most refused to classify as leisure because it was felt as ’something else’. Now we need some concept of work-life-data balance? I’m still with the “at least it’s better than TV” mob (eg Clay Shirky) though. Okay back to twitter.

  3. reading is an outmoded component of old media? wtf?