menu

Ad Week Climate Change Symposium: Hope?

Ad Week Climate Change Symposium: Hope?
Advertising

Last Wednesday I attended Ad Week’s Climate Change Symposium. Here, the world of NYC advertising shared with the audience that it has found its niche within the climate change agenda, which is to engage ‘consumers’ and ‘internal stakeholders’ in a movement that in turn will activate policy and drive global agreements.

Tamara Giltsoff
  • 28 september 2009

But honestly, my overall take-out from the symposium is that I don’t yet feel the advertising approach best leverages the possibility of ‘marketing’ today: brand leadership and innovation on key global issues; the role advocacy and citizen engagement; wholly integrated, collaborative and ground-up in approach; peer-to-peer and community platforms, service thinking and cooperative models in place of campaigns; tied to business innovation and transformation; and beyond communications to new market stimulation. Nor is it enough.

Sadly, the popular approach at the event focused on campaigns developed for key distinct issues or activities versus marketing ingenuity integrated into whole societal and economic sustainable transformation. It’s the difference between saying an issue is important in the world and coming up with smart (value generating) solutions to the issue and organizing people around this. Jeremy Heimans of Purpose Campaigns, sitting next to me at the event, shared with his thoughts that “there seems to be no intrinsic understanding of how to organize people and systematically move them up a curve of engagement to build a long-term sustained political movement and actual transition on the ground”.

It seems like the campaign approach happens for a number of reasons:

1) it is grounded in the paradigm of ‘business’ selling needs to ‘consumer’, so I heard a lot of talk about how we can engage ‘consumers’ in climate change through campaign work, when actually it is a global, citizen issue. There is a difference: the citizen approach treats people as active agents and stakeholders in the planet/ecosystem and economy, and it provides solutions and engaging platforms to deal with the issues. The consumer approach asks ‘consumers’ for their attention and commitment to a campaign and a brand, disconnected from their role in the transformation. It externalizes the issue and play on a benefit to the brand, but not the movement nor the transition; it asks consumers to declare: “Yes I care about climate change”, but it does not ask for ground-up change and ownership of the one planet we have and finite amount of resources it gives to us. It sees government, business and people as separate parts, each playing a different role, with probably government/policy at the helm of planetary responsibility.

2) the job is not alone a communication issue in most instances and therefore requires a fundamental look at the long term viability and fit of whole industries and the redefinition business models within them, which is hard for most of the communications industry, in its current guise, to do. Fair enough.

Take for example Coca Cola, very present at the event, that is striving ahead with its commitment to recycling plants and mass communications on recycling but side-stepping the longer term look at its role and the relevance and feasibility of a producer of 1.6 billion bottles of liquid pop/water a day. (Well, certainly publicly anyway). Not that I expect a beverage business to completely reinvent overnight, but there was/is zero evidence of their bigger point of view in an emerging world where climate change, peak oil, regulation, scare materials, economic meltdown, and ethical values are driving the market. I just don’t see their big global view on this and where this will take their business; nor do I see their role or a voice on global agreements. Note as example that it took the UN to brief the ad industry, to then get brands like Coca Cola and SAP to put their name to communicating COP15 to global citizens. Why did no one single brand initiate the discussion and engagement, and a vision and voice on global climate change agreements up until now? Strikes me as an incredible missed opportunity and a sign of the ill-understood role for brands and corporations.

I do applaud Coke for taking on Copenhagen messages so visibly and quickly at this stage and I am somewhat optimistic that their role will eventually go deeper and wider than a communications campaign circling around their recycling commitment. Coca Cola, are you joining the world change? Fingers crossed.

3) the part that is a pure-play communication need, like the strong case for citizen engagement around and beyond Copenhagen and resulting “Hopenhagen” work, is highly complex and difficult. It demands not a ‘campaign’ view of communications – ie, a brilliantly creative push to muster the attention and twittering of millions of people worldwide – but movement creation, actual activation (versus passive attention) and ongoing platforms that will engage and transform the way we do things to add real value to our lives, such as giving us jobs or food grown naturally and locally or securing water supply. Heimans commented he was not shocked to see the UN engage ad agencies on the Copenhagen work versus political organizers to get citizens engaged, citing the UN as “not exactly people-driven”. I hadn’t seen it that way around.

As example here, I couldn’t help wonder why no brand had taken on a role in the sort of citizen engagement effort that The Climate Group are up to in the US, which is to influence the “Gang of 16” Senators who are opposing US climate policy and in turn holding up progress global climate change negotiations, by engaging their constituents/the local citizens on the ground. Their task is mass citizen engagement around the positive impact of a new clean energy economy and the stimulus for innovation; it is to help engage these intensive/heavy industry communities in a brighter more prosperous future ahead by working at the State level to actually stimulate new economies and provide community platforms on the issues. CG is mainly doing this through story telling and literally discussion with citizens – exposing inspiring stories of others like them around the world that are benefiting from a transition to a clean economy. I’d say there’s even a further level to go that could involve re-training programs, investment and match funding stimulus money, open innovation and discussion platforms, connections with others emerging industries world wide etc. It seems so basic, but unless we engage people we will not get political movement and consensus.

One day (hopefully) we will look back at our ridiculous it seemed to convince people to secure their future on the planet, but alas that is the task.

It’s a big effort, but it’s an effort with clear, tangible benefits for people if the platforms for transformation are provided. Surely that is a nice juicy role for brands and the opportunity to create new forms of value in this emerging world?

I am going to round off with a few other final observations from the event:

The event has to be the only talk I’ve ever been to that did not invite discussion, questions or participation from the audience. Something to be said about an open dialogue on issues that are emergent as no one knows the answers and least not the ad industry alone. So why close the dialogue Ad Week? The lion-share of the brands represented on stage pretty much started their sentence by saying “We’ve had sustainability at the heart of our corporate agenda for [circa] 30 odd years”. Erm, if so, why no voice on it and why not tell anyone? And why is there a climate issue then?

Most people on the panels mainly talked about the work they are doing TODAY, and how successful it is, versus any discussion on where the world needs to get to and their macro role in this transition. I heard about “Our green equation”, in reference to the bit in business that is doing green, which implies that green is only a bit of something, which implies the opposite to sustainability being at the heart of corporate strategy. I heard about the need for “disclosure”, which I hope will one day be an extinct word, because everything will be known and there won’t be this disconnection between corporation and society. Just a personal hope. I heard people referred to as ‘consumers’, all the way through the morning. I believe we must start thinking about what is beyond consumption as we know it or using consumption as the communication vehicle to engage people in world change. I know it is radical, but radical change is coming whether it is adapting to climate change or addressing it.

As noted, it took the UN to brief the agencies to brief the brands to make any sort of statement about global climate change agreements. Why did no brand start this movement? Why did no one see it coming?
Bill Becker talked about moving governments on climate policy and the role that brands and advertisers play moving votes by engaging people, which is in summary my whole point to this article. I whole-heartedly agree.
The Hopenhagen work is excellent: it’s positive and inspiring, I just HOPE it goes beyond a campaign for COP15 and much deeper than powerful communications because as Climate Progress rightly points out, COP15 is one part of the journey and by no means the end. That, and the job for communications has to go deeper than a YES VOTE for global agreements that sadly won’t be enough either.

[image by streuwerk]

Advertising
Trending

Japanese Face Wash Creates A Perfect Rose Every Time

Arts & Culture
Mobile Yesterday

Get A Better Idea Of How You Are Wasting Your Time

The TouchTime app is trying to revolutionize personal task management by providing detailed insight on how to be more efficient

Culture Yesterday

London Telephone Box Repurposed As A Tiny Mobile Repair Shop

Tools and supplies to replace broken screens or damage are neatly stowed away in these micro-workrooms

Trending

Get PSFK's Latest Report: Future of Work

See All
Design Yesterday

Conceptual Sportswear Created Out Of Futuristic Condom Material

A Dutch fashion designer is experimenting with new methods and fabrics to make high performance clothing

Fashion Yesterday

Fashionable Tassel Will Ensure You Never Lose Your Valuables Again

The device is fashion meets connected tech, that will help you keep track of your belongings at all times

PURPLELIST EXPERTS

Michelle Phan

cosmetics, e-commerce, online retail, beauty, lifestyle, fashion

Syndicated Yesterday

Would You Wear Wool Shoes To Save The Environment?

As demand for wool shoes grows, a number of US footwear brands are heading directly to the source: the sheep pastures of New Zealand

Sustainability Yesterday

Self-Healing Material Is Fashioned Out Of Squid Teeth

Penn State researchers have devised a new textile that uses organic proteins

Arts & Culture Yesterday

Search Engine Turns Your Own Drawings Into Photos

This image-matching software accepts hand-made sketches instead of keywords

PSFK LABS REPORT

Future Of Work
Cultivating The Next Generation Of Leaders
NEW

PSFK Op-Ed august 25, 2016

Retail Expert: What Sustainability Means To The Millennial Generation

Jo Godden, Founder of RubyMoon, discusses how brands can limit their environmental impact worldwide

PSFK Labs august 25, 2016

PSFK’s Workplace Vision: How The Nurturing Of Seeds Will Come To Define The Onboarding Process

Our Future of Work vision is a service that allows companies to assemble and deliver welcome packets that are uniquely focused on the concept of growth

Arts & Culture Yesterday

Illustrator Interprets The Experiences Of Blind Travelers

Artist Alby Letoy creates drawings of poignant travel memories for the visually impaired

Advertising Yesterday

Clickbait Titles Used For The Good Of Charity

An agency devised an unlikely campaign that uses clickbait as a positive force to drive awareness to nonprofit initiatives

Advertising Yesterday

The Best In Eye-Catching Olympics Campaigns

PSFK rounds out the Rio Games with our picks for the best advertising moments off the field

Work Yesterday

Editorial Roundtable: The Arrival Of The People-First Workplace

Managed By Q, Soma, Workbar, Primary and thinkPARALLAX enumerate the reasons why companies need an employee-embracing workforce in order to exist

Arts & Culture Yesterday

Transforming Light Waves Into A New Art Form

An artist uses glass treated with layers of metallic coatings to create a unique installation called lightpaintings

INSIGHTS COVERAGE

Rio Olympics
Innovation Coverage From The Rio Games
READ NOW

Design Yesterday

This Windbreaker Lets You Explore The Outdoors While Charging Your Phone

The apparel includes solar panels that allow the wearer to stay connected through the power of renewable energy

Asia Yesterday

The Goal Of This Game Is To Not Get Laid Off From Your Job

A hit mobile app has you working really, really hard to not get fired as you climb the corporate ladder

Advertising Yesterday

Movie Critic Bot Guides Viewers Through Festival Offerings

The Toronto International Film Festival has created a Facebook Messenger chatbot to help attendants curate their schedule

No search results found.