Dan Gillmor: In Our Digital World We License, Not Own

Dan Gillmor: In Our Digital World We License, Not Own

Corporations and lawmakers have put us on course for a world where consumers do not own the things they buy.

Dan Gilmor, The Guardian
  • 8 april 2013

Powered by
This article titled “In our digital world you don’t own stuff, you just license it” was written by Dan Gillmor, for on Friday 5th April 2013 12.30 UTC

A federal judge has reminded us of a fundamental reality: if it’s digital, we don’t own it. In an unfortunate but unsurprising ruling, District Judge Richard J Sullivan sided (pdf) with the Copyright Cartel – specifically, Capitol Records in this case – against an innovative startup that was providing a marketplace for used songs.

Had the users of the startup, ReDigi, been selling used CDs via any number of online stores, there would have been no issue. But the music in this case was stored in computer files, so the doctrine of “first sale” – your right to resell what you’ve bought – didn’t apply.

ReDigi tried hard to live up to the spirit of copyright law. It created a system where the uploader of a “purchased” iTunes song would lose access to the music after the file was transferred to the new “buyer’s” computer. Yeah, right, said the record company and the judge – there’s no way to ensure that the “seller” wasn’t keeping the song anyway.

The first-sale doctrine has been an essential part of American copyright law. If you buy a book, you can resell it or give it away (or even throw it away). The new owner, or your heirs, will have the same rights. First sale got a big boost recently when the supreme court rejected a publisher’s stance that a book it sold overseas couldn’t legally be resold in the United States.

But with digital material, as I noted in this space a few months ago, the original owners are only providing you a license to use the material. This creates a market condition they absolutely love, where your possession of the material lasts, essentially, only as long as you do. Less freedom for you, more sales – sorry, licenses – for them.

America’s top copyright official, Maria A Pallante, has at least noted the first-sale conundrum in a world where so much of what we read, hear and watch is born – and remains – digital. In testimony before Congress and in a recent speech, she recalled that the Copyright Office, which she heads, recommended in 2001 that Congress not change any laws to create digital first-sale rights. And she listed some of the choices lawmakers might make should they review the issue.

“On the one hand, Congress may believe that in a digital marketplace, the copyright owner should control all copies of his work, particularly because digital copies are perfect copies (not dog-eared copies of lesser value) or because in online commerce the migration from the sale of copies to the proffering of licenses has negated the issue.

On the other hand, Congress may find that the general principle of first sale has ongoing merit in the digital age and can be adequately policed through technology – for example, measures that would prevent or destroy duplicative copies. Or, more simply, Congress may not want a copyright law where everything is licensed and nothing is owned.”

Neither choice is especially appetizing, though the idea of absolute control of absolutely everything by copyright holders should be anathema by definition. Policing of reselling rights “through technology” – what ReDigi was attempting to do – is better, but has an enormous flaw: it invites a regime in which everything people read (hear, watch, etc) is tracked. We already have a problem in this regard with digital licensing; we need to find ways to restore anonymous media consumption for all kinds of licensing and sales.

But let’s be clear: Congress and corporations have not disguised that a world where “everything is licensed and nothing is owned” is exactly what they want. And it’s not just media content that’s involved. As software becomes more and more embedded into everyday products, their manufacturers are using code restrictions – and copyright law – to thwart buyers’ choices. As Kyle Wiens recently wrote at Wired, we don’t own our phones, which carriers refuse to unlock, or even our cars, which are becoming computer networks on wheels.

The people who gain inordinate profits from abusing copyright to control their customers won’t see things my way anytime soon. So I’m casting my lot, at least to the extent that I can, with the people who give me tools to liberate myself from that control. I hope you will, too. A lot rides on who prevails. © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.


Machine Printer Uses Coffee Drips To Create Intricate Portraits

Arts & Culture
Technology december 2, 2016

Why Nest Doesn't Get The Holidays

PSFK founder reacts to the damaging effects of poor email marketing

Children december 2, 2016

Robots Could Be Joining Dubai’s Police Force In 2017

The real-life RoboCops can salute, shake hands and collect traffic fines


Get PSFK's Related Report: Future of Retail 2017

See All
Travel december 2, 2016

Parka Hides And Charges Portable Devices

Bolt is a jacket that lets people carry and charge their various electronics without the need for an outlet

Related Expert

Ryan Chin

Cities, Internet of Things, Data

Food december 2, 2016

Yelp's New 'Yelfie' Feature Lets Diners Take Selfies

The update is designed to encourage people to attach a selfie when they share their experiences

Design & Architecture december 2, 2016

Build Your Own Savory Cheese Advent Calendar

A British food blogger has created a guide to building a different kind of holiday surprise

Fitness & Sport december 2, 2016

Floating Gym Concept In Paris Is Powered By Your Workout

The proposed design from Carlo Ratti Associati lets passengers ride a stationary bike as they travel through Paris along the Seine River


Future Of Retail 2017
Transformation Strategies For Customer-First Business

PSFK Op-Ed november 22, 2016

Digital Strategist: Why “Big Sensing” Is Key To Retail’s Future

Bud Caddell, Founder of NOBL, shares why the most capable and useful asset in any retail environment is the workforce

PSFK Labs december 1, 2016

Retail Spotlight: Home Depot Reimagines How Employees Conduct Tasks

The home improvement retailer puts the customer first by initiating local fulfillment centers and simplifying freight-to-shelf inventory management

Syndicated december 2, 2016

What Does The Future Of Android Look Like In A World With The Pixel?

Google’s decision to make its own phone might have looked like a blow to the likes of Samsung but the reality is much more interesting

Retail december 2, 2016

Customer Service Expert: Why Offline Retail Has Better Data Than Online Retail

Healey Cypher, Founder and CEO of Oak Labs, shares why we should be thinking about the physical store as an e-commerce site

Fashion december 2, 2016

Alexander McQueen Designs A 3D-Printed Umbrella

3D-printed fashion arrives in time for the winter season

Work december 2, 2016

Why Training Associates To Be Advocates Is Key To Retail Success

In our Future of Retail 2017 report, PSFK Labs discusses strategies to prioritize customer service, which begins with associate advocates

Media & Publishing december 2, 2016

Netflix Creates Binge Candle To Celebrate A New Season Of Gilmore Girls

The streaming service developed a special layered candle that creates candle with episode-specific smells


Future Of Work
Cultivating The Next Generation Of Leaders

Arts & Culture december 2, 2016

Interactive Film Tells A Story About Living With Cancer

A moving song written by a father of a cancer patient comes alive in a 3D environment

Automotive december 2, 2016

Audi And LEGO Exhibit Autonomous Vehicle Installation

The installation at Design Miami explores the 25th hour, which represents bonus productive work or play time

No search results found.